Various observers have noted postural changes in certain lung volumes, such as vital capacity, ex-piratory reserve and functional residual capacity. Comparative studies of the respiratory dead space in different postures apparently have not been made although the volume of the dead space, as measured by various methods, has been found to vary with the extent of lung inflation. The effect of change in posture upon the respiratory dead space is of interest, since pulmonary efficiency is evaluated clinically using various types of "dead space" measurements in different postures (1-3). The studies reported here indicate that the volume of the respiratory dead space (the volume of inspired gas which does not contribute to dilution of alveolar gas) is greater when the subject is sitting than when supine; these postural changes are associated with similar changes in functional residual capacity. METHODS The subjects were five healthy male physicians, varying in age from 27 to 35 years. The "estimation" method of measuring respiratory dead space by the use of the Lilly nitrogen and flow meters (4) was used with one change: the calibration of the flow meter was obtained by passing expired gas through it to a recording spirometer so that the actual volume could be related to the area bounded by the flow record and its zero line. Details of the expiratory flow pattern cannot be recorded faithfully by this technique, but the flow tracings are satisfactory for the measurement of dead space. Each subject assumed, in varying order, three positions: (1) sitting in a chair, (2) lying in bed with the head and trunk elevated 45 60° above the bed, (3) supine in bed with one pillow under the head. After he had rested several minutes in a given position, the subject breathed 02 for at least one minute. Respiratory dead space was measured from the records of four successive expirations in each position. The mean values for each subject are given in Table I; a difference of 13 ml or more between these means is significant. The average tidal volume for the first minute of 02 breathing was obtained from the spirometric record. All volumes are corrected to BTPS. Changes in functional residual capacity were measured in the same subjects in the same three positions. Subjects rebreathed for an eight to ten minute period into a 6 liter recording Benedict-Roth type spirometer filled with 02 and containing a CO2 absorber. During this time they were placed in the various postures and maintained there until a fairly stable end-expiratory level was evident, usually within about ten breaths. Because a continuous spirometric record was necessary, these changes in position were made rapidly by using a chair with a hinged back. Best straight lines (slopes) were drawn on the record defining end-expiratory level for each position. Thus, if on changing from the sitting to the supine position, the volume of gas in the spirometer increased 800 ml, the volume of the functional residual capacity was considered to have decreased by a similar amount. RESULTS All subjects had smaller functional residual capacities in the semi-reclining and supine positions than when sitting. The average decreases were respectively 556 and 787 ml. The respiratory dead space in all subjects was significantly smaller in the supine position than when sitting; the respective average values were 101 and 147 ml. The mean decrease, 46 ml, was highly significant (p = 0.01). In the semi-reclining position intermediate values, averaging 124 ml, were found. The dead space/tidal volume fraction was reduced from an average value of 27.5%o in the sitting position to 18%b in the supine position. The mean decrease, 9.5%o, was significant (p = 0.05). DISCUSSION Previous studies have shown that the volume of the respiratory dead space varies directly with changes in lung inflation produced voluntarily or by hyperventilation (4). These data indicate a 1437
CITATION STYLE
Fowler, W. S. (1950). LUNG FUNCTION STUDIES. IV. POSTURAL CHANGES IN RESPIRATORY DEAD SPACE AND FUNCTIONAL RESIDUAL CAPACITY 1. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 29(11), 1437–1438. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci102382
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.