Muscle reoxygenation difference between superficial and deep regions of the muscles during static knee extension

0Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that differences in vertical spatial difference in reoxygenation after exercise exists, reflecting heterogeneity of muscle oxygenation during exercise might be due to the difference in dominantly recruited muscle fiber type. Methods: Ten healthy female subjects performed 1 min static knee extension exercise at low (30%) and high (60%) fraction ofmaximal voluntary contraction (MVC).Muscle oxygenation in the vastus lateralis (VL) was monitored using multi channel near-infrared spectroscopy. Half time reoxygenation (T1/2reoxy) after exercise was calculated from oxygenated hemoglobin in the eight channelswhich changed the distance between light source and detector distances at 2,3,4,5 cm. Blood flow (BF) in the femoral artery was measured by Doppler ultrasound. Mean arterial blood pressure (BP) at the end of the exercise was assessed by a Finometer device. Results: BF during exercise did not differ significantly during exercise at low and high intensity, whereas BP was elevated at high intensity. T1/2reoxy tended to be prolonged at high intensity. It would be due to a transition of muscle fiber recruitment from type I toward type II fiber dominance, and/or insufficient oxygen supply for increased demand in the muscle. T1/2reoxy in different light source and detector distances was not different among them. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the reoxygenation in the superficial region did not differ from that in the deeper region, including superficial, even when exercise intensity was high. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ueda, C., & Kagaya, A. (2010). Muscle reoxygenation difference between superficial and deep regions of the muscles during static knee extension. In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology (Vol. 662, pp. 329–334). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1241-1_47

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free