Protecting expert advice for the public: promoting safety and improved communications

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The drivers of the harassment and intimidation of researchers are complex, widespread, and global in their reach and were being studied across many disciplines even before COVID-19. This policy briefing reviews some of the scholarship on this wide-ranging problem but focuses on what can be done to help ensure that Canadians fully benefit from the work of Canada's researchers while also preserving the security and safety of those researchers. It identifies policies and actions that can be implemented in the near term to gather information on the problem, better frame public research communications, and ensure that mechanisms are readily available to support researchers who are threatened. The policy briefing is concerned with researchers, but these behaviours are also harming journalists, politicians, public health communicators, and many others more fully in the public eye than researchers. Some recommendations here may help to address this wider problem.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wright, J. M., Chun, W. H. K., Clarke, A., Herder, M., & Ramos, H. (2022). Protecting expert advice for the public: promoting safety and improved communications. Facets, 7, 482–508. https://doi.org/10.1139/FACETS-2021-0181

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free