Integration of GIS, electromagnetic and electrical methods in the delimitation of groundwater polluted by effluent discharge (Salamanca, Spain): A case study

10Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present work envisages the possible geometry of a contaminated plume of groundwater near hospital facilities by combining GIS (Geographic Information System) and geophysical methods. The rock underlying the soil and thin sedimentary cover of the study area is moderately fractured quartzite, which makes aquifers vulnerable to pollution. The GIS methodology is used to calculate the area that would be affected by the effluent source of residual water, based on algorithms that consider ground surface mapping (slopes, orientations, accumulated costs and cost per distance). Geophysical methods (electromagnetic induction and electric resistivity tomography) use changes in the electrical conductivity or resistivity of the subsurface to determine the geometry of the discharge and the degree of contamination. The model presented would allow a preliminary investigation regarding potential corrective measures.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Study area and topographic a ( as e li es: drainage net ork).
  • Figure 3. Methodological sequence with GIS (Geographic Information System) technique: digital elevation model (A), drainage network (B), accumulated costs (C) and possible routes map (D).
  • Figure 4. Meshing of sampling points for the separation between the coils of 10 m (A) and 20 m (B). Electrical conductivity maps obtained with a horizontal dipole (vertical coils) with a spacing of 10 m (C) and 20 m (D).
  • Figure  5. A. Location of  acquisition of  three profiles M1, M2  and M3. The  inset  shows  the PASI  16SG24‐N resistivimeter, the energizer and the two link boxes. 
  • Figure 6. Deli itation of effluent discharge using GIS techniques based on a cost–distance algorithm (left) and 3D (three di ensional) odeling ith an ArcScene script (right).
  • Figure 7. ERT (Electrical Resistivity Tomography) profiles M1 (A), M2 (B) and M3 (C), and 3D layout (D). The surface limit of the spill as deduced from GIS methodology is included (dashed line).
  • Figure 8. Bar chart of RMS (Root Mean Square) error statistics for the three profiles.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Montes, R. V., Martínez-Graña, A. M., Catalán, J. R. M., Arribas, P. A., San Román, F. J. S., & Zazo, C. (2017). Integration of GIS, electromagnetic and electrical methods in the delimitation of groundwater polluted by effluent discharge (Salamanca, Spain): A case study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14111369

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

36%

Researcher 4

36%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

27%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 5

56%

Engineering 2

22%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

11%

Computer Science 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0