Evaluation of diagnostic criteria and red flags of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein encephalomyelitis in a clinical routine cohort

9Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-IgG) have been proposed to define “MOG encephalomyelitis” (MOG-EM), with published diagnostic and “red flag” criteria. We aimed to evaluate these criteria in a routine clinical setting. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with borderline/positive MOG-IgG and applied the diagnostic and red flag criteria to determine likelihood of MOG-EM diagnosis. Para-/clinical parameters were described and analyzed with chi-square test. Results: In total, 37 patients fulfilled MOG-EM diagnostic criteria (female-to-male ratio: 1.6:1, median onset age: 28.0 years [IQR 18.5-40.5], n = 8 with pediatric onset). In 24/37, red flags were present, predominantly MOG-IgG at assay cutoff and/or MRI lesions suggestive of multiple sclerosis (MS). As proposed in the consensus criteria, these patients should rather be described as “possible” MOG-EM. Of these, we classified 13 patients as “unlikely” MOG-EM in the presence of the red flag “borderline MOG-IgG” with negative MOG-IgG retest or coincidence of ≥1 additional red flag. This group mainly consisted of patients diagnosed with MS (n = 11). Frequency of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF-)—specific oligoclonal bands (OCB) is significantly lower in definite vs possible and unlikely MOG-EM (P =.0005). Conclusion: Evaluation of diagnostic and red flag criteria, MOG-IgG retesting (incl. change of assay), and CSF-specific OCB are relevant in clinical routine cohorts to differentiate MOG-EM from MS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Veselaj, K., Kamber, N., Briner, M., Friedli, C., Diem, L., Guse, K., … Salmen, A. (2021). Evaluation of diagnostic criteria and red flags of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein encephalomyelitis in a clinical routine cohort. CNS Neuroscience and Therapeutics, 27(4), 426–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.13461

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free