Comparison of 2c- and 3cLIF droplet temperature imaging

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This work presents “pulsed 2D-3cLIF-EET” as a measurement setup for micro-droplet internal temperature imaging. The setup relies on a third color channel that allows correcting spatially changing energy transfer rates between the two applied fluorescent dyes. First measurement results are compared with results of two slightly different versions of the recent “pulsed 2D-2cLIF-EET” method. Results reveal a higher temperature measurement accuracy of the recent 2cLIF setup. Average droplet temperature is determined by the 2cLIF setup with an uncertainty of less than 1 K and a spatial deviation of about 3.7 K. The new 3cLIF approach would become competitive, if the existing droplet size dependency is anticipated by an additional calibration and if the processing algorithm includes spatial measurement errors more appropriately.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Palmer, J., Reddemann, M. A., Kirsch, V., & Kneer, R. (2018). Comparison of 2c- and 3cLIF droplet temperature imaging. Experiments in Fluids, 59(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-018-2545-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free