Tamsulosin vs. Tadalafi l as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: Medical expulsive therapy (MET) is recommended for distal ureteral stones from 5 to 10 mm. The best drug for MET is still uncertain. In this review, we aim to compare the effectiveness of tadalafi l and tamsulosin for distal ureteral stones from 5 to 10 mm in terms of stone expulsion rate (SER), stone expulsion time (SET) and the side effect profi le. Materials and methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and Web of Science, from inception until April 2023. Only randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. Results: Eleven publications with 1,330 patients were included. We observed that tadalafi l has a higher SER (OR 0.55, CI 95% 0.38;0.80, p=0.02, I2=52%) and the same effi cacy in SET (MD 1.07, CI 95% -0.25; 2.39, p=0.11, I2=84%). No differences were found when comparing side effects as headache, backache, dizziness, and orthostatic hypotension. Conclusion: Tadalafi l has a higher stone expulsion rate than tamsulosin as a medical expulsive therapy for patients with distal stones from 5 to 10 mm without differences in side effects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Belkovsky, M., Zogaib, G. V., Passerotti, C. C., de Almeida Artifon, E. L., Otoch, J. P., & da Cruz, J. A. S. (2023, November 1). Tamsulosin vs. Tadalafi l as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Braz J Urol. Brazilian Society of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0345

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free