Historical cosmologies: Epistemology and axiology in Australian secondary school history discourse

73Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper considers the discourse of modern history in Australian secondary schools from the perspectives of systemic functional linguistics and social realist sociology of education. In particular it develops work on genre and field in history discourse in relation to knowledge structure, and the role of technical concepts realised as '-isms'. These are interpreted in relation to recent social realist work on the axiological charging of terms, especially in humanities and social science discourse, so that how you feel turns out to be as important as what you know as far as an historian's gaze on the past is concerned. This cosmological perspective is illustrated from textbooks and classroom interaction, examining the ways in which history students are apprenticed into relevant constellations of meaning.

References Powered by Scopus

Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay

789Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing

295Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The grammar of history: Enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language

208Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Making semantic waves: A key to cumulative knowledge-building

268Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Disciplinary differences in the use of English in higher education: Reflections on recent language policy developments

203Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Embedded literacy: Knowledge as meaning

97Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martin, J., Maton, K., & Matruglio, E. (2010). Historical cosmologies: Epistemology and axiology in Australian secondary school history discourse. Revista Signos, 43(74), 433–463. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342010000500003

Readers over time

‘11‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 34

57%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 10

17%

Researcher 6

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Linguistics 27

47%

Social Sciences 19

33%

Arts and Humanities 8

14%

Philosophy 4

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0