Understanding the causes of intravenous medication administration errors in hospitals: A qualitative critical incident study

57Citations
Citations of this article
285Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the underlying causes of intravenous medication administration errors (MAEs) in National Health Service (NHS) hospitals. Setting: Two NHS teaching hospitals in the North West of England. Participants: Twenty nurses working in a range of inpatient clinical environments were identified and recruited using purposive sampling at each study site. Primary outcome measures: Semistructured interviews were conducted with nurse participants using the critical incident technique, where they were asked to discuss perceived causes of intravenous MAEs that they had been directly involved with. Transcribed interviews were analysed using the Framework approach and emerging themes were categorised according to Reason's model of accident causation. Results: In total, 21 intravenous MAEs were discussed containing 23 individual active failures which included slips and lapses (n=11), mistakes (n=8) and deliberate violations of policy (n=4). Each active failure was associated with a range of error and violation provoking conditions. The working environment was implicated when nurses lacked healthcare team support and/or were exposed to a perceived increased workload during ward rounds, shift changes or emergencies. Nurses frequently reported that the quality of intravenous dose-checking activities was compromised due to high perceived workload and working relationships. Nurses described using approaches such as subconscious functioning and prioritising to manage their duties, which at times contributed to errors. Conclusions: Complex interactions between active and latent failures can lead to intravenous MAEs in hospitals. Future interventions may need to be multimodal in design in order to mitigate these risks and reduce the burden of intravenous MAEs.

References Powered by Scopus

Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

6526Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The critical incident technique

6018Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias

930Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Lessons learned for reducing the negative impact of adverse events on patients, health professionals and healthcare organizations

58Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nurses’ Perceived Causes of Medication Administration Errors: A Qualitative Systematic Review

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Factors leading to unsafe behavior in the twenty first century workplace: a review

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Keers, R. N., Williams, S. D., Cooke, J., & Ashcroft, D. M. (2015). Understanding the causes of intravenous medication administration errors in hospitals: A qualitative critical incident study. BMJ Open, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005948

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 94

65%

Researcher 22

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 18

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 11

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 76

47%

Medicine and Dentistry 60

37%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 19

12%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 23

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free