A single session of action observation therapy versus observing a natural landscape in adults with chronic neck pain – a randomized controlled trial

0Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Action observation (AO) has emerged as a potential neurorehabilitation therapy for patients with neck pain (NP), but evidence of its effectiveness is scarce. This study aims to assess the effect of a single session of AO when compared to observing a natural landscape on NP intensity, fear of movement, fear-avoidance beliefs, neck muscles’ strength, pressure pain threshold, and tactile acuity. Methods: Sixty participants with NP were randomly allocated to the AO group (n = 30) or control group (n = 30). Both groups watched an 11-minute video: the AO group watched a video of a person matched for age and sex performing neck exercises, while the control group watched a video of natural landscapes. Neck pain intensity, fear of movement, fear-avoidance beliefs, tactile acuity, pressure pain thresholds, and neck muscle strength were assessed both at baseline and post-intervention. General linear models of repeated measures (ANCOVA of two factors) were used to explore between-group differences at post-intervention. Results: There was a significant main effect of time for pain intensity (p = 0.02; η2p = 0.09; within-group mean change and 95% CI: AO=-1.44 (-2.28, -0.59); control=-1.90 (-2.74, -1.06), but no time versus group interaction (p = 0.46). A time versus group significant interaction was found for one out of the six measurement sites of two-point discrimination and the neck flexors strength (p < 0.05) favoring the control group. No other statistically significant differences were found for the remaining variables). Conclusions: Results suggest a similar acute benefit for both a single session of AO and observing natural landscapes for promoting hypoalgesia, but no impact on kinesiophobia, fear-avoidance beliefs, or pressure pain thresholds. Also, AO had no positive effect on two-point discrimination and muscle strength. Further research is needed, with longer interventions. Trial registration: Clinialtrials.gov (NCT05078489).

References Powered by Scopus

The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and Validation

6293Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP)

3656Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interpreting the Clinical Importance of Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials: IMMPACT Recommendations

2662Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al Shrbaji, T., Bou-Assaf, M., Andias, R., & Silva, A. G. (2023). A single session of action observation therapy versus observing a natural landscape in adults with chronic neck pain – a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-07070-w

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 8

67%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

17%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

8%

Arts and Humanities 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free