Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer: Evidence, Controversies, Consensus

17Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The results of the international St. Gallen Consensus Conference for the treatment of patients with primary breast cancer were discussed this year by a working group of leading breast cancer experts in view of the therapy recommendations for everyday clinical practice in Germany. Three of the breast cancer experts are also members of this year's St. Gallen panel. The comparison of the St. Gallen recommendations with the annually updated treatment recommendations of the AGO 2019 as well as the S3 guideline is useful, since the recommendations of the St. Gallen panel represent the opinions of experts from various countries and disciplines. The recommendations of the S3 guideline and AGO are based on evidence-based research of the literature. This year's 16th St. Gallen conference featured the motto Magnitude of clinical benefit. In addition to the evidence-based data, each therapeutic decision must also undergo a benefit/risk assessment of the patient's individual situation and be discussed with the patient.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Untch, M., Thomssen, C., Bauerfeind, I., Braun, M., Brucker, S. Y., Felberbaum, R., … Harbeck, N. (2019). Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer: Evidence, Controversies, Consensus. Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde, 79(6), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0897-6457

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free