Participatory design of an improvement intervention for the primary care management of possible sepsis using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method

34Citations
Citations of this article
104Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Ensuring effective identification and management of sepsis is a healthcare priority in many countries. Recommendations for sepsis management in primary care have been produced, but in complex healthcare systems, an in-depth understanding of current system interactions and functioning is often essential before improvement interventions can be successfully designed and implemented. A structured participatory design approach to model a primary care system was employed to hypothesise gaps between work as intended and work delivered to inform improvement and implementation priorities for sepsis management. Methods: In a Scottish regional health authority, multiple stakeholders were interviewed and the records of patients admitted from primary care to hospital with possible sepsis analysed. This identified the key work functions required to manage these patients successfully, the influence of system conditions (such as resource availability) and the resulting variability of function output. This information was used to model the system using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM). The multiple stakeholder interviews also explored perspectives on system improvement needs which were subsequently themed. The FRAM model directed an expert group to reconcile improvement suggestions with current work systems and design an intervention to improve clinical management of sepsis. Results: Fourteen key system functions were identified, and a FRAM model was created. Variability was found in the output of all functions. The overall system purpose and improvement priorities were agreed. Improvement interventions were reconciled with the FRAM model of current work to understand how best to implement change, and a multi-component improvement intervention was designed. Conclusions: Traditional improvement approaches often focus on individual performance or a specific care process, rather than seeking to understand and improve overall performance in a complex system. The construction of the FRAM model facilitated an understanding of the complexity of interactions within the current system, how system conditions influence everyday sepsis management and how proposed interventions would work within the context of the current system. This directed the design of a multi-component improvement intervention that organisations could locally adapt and implement with the aim of improving overall system functioning and performance to improve sepsis management.

References Powered by Scopus

Three approaches to qualitative content analysis

29291Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups

23704Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock

8375Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Framing the FRAM: A literature review on the functional resonance analysis method

194Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modeling complex socio-technical systems using the FRAM: A literature review

68Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development and application of systems thinking' principles for quality improvement

54Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McNab, D., Freestone, J., Black, C., Carson-Stevens, A., & Bowie, P. (2018). Participatory design of an improvement intervention for the primary care management of possible sepsis using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method. BMC Medicine, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1164-x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 38

63%

Researcher 14

23%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

10%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 15

33%

Medicine and Dentistry 14

30%

Engineering 12

26%

Psychology 5

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free