A 10-Year Saudi Experience of Using Adalimumab in Treating Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Abstract

Introduction: Traditionally, management of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) involves use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) or disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), such as methotrexate (MTX) or sulfasalazine; or steroids. However, in several cases, a low therapeutic response or important side effects are encountered. This study reports our experience in using adalimumab in JIA patients by assessing the efficacy and safety of this treatment in this category of patients. Objectives: To reports our experience in using adalimumab in JIA patients by assessing the efficacy and safety of this treatment in this category of patients. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted among 38 patients with JIA at the Pediatric Department, King Abdulaziz Univesrity Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, in the period January 2005-March 2016. Patients' records were reviewed and relevant demographic and clinical data were collected. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21 and represented using tables. Results: The 38 patients were distributed as 11 (28.9%) males and 27 (71.1%); mean ± SD age was 11.91 ± 4.54 (range = 3-19) years. Mean ± SD (range) disease duration was 3.26 ± 2.52 (0-12) years and most frequent diagnoses included polyarticular rheumatoid factor (RF) negative form 12 (31.6%), followed by systemic and oligoarticu-lar JIA with 9 (23.7%) cases each. Before adalimumab,fever was present in 13 (34.2%) cases, followed by rash in 8 (21.0%) cases; while 21 (55.3%) were asymptomatic. Thirty-one (81.6%) were in failure of MTX, 19 (50%) of steroids, 7 (18.4%) of NSAIDS and 3 (7.9%) had had intraarticular injections. Biologically, ANA, RF and anti-CCP were positive in 22 (57.9%), 8 (21.1%) and 4 (10.5%) of the cases, respectively. Uveitis was present in 11 (28.9%) of the patients. Analysis of adalimumab efficacy showed 10 (52.6%) cases of complete remission, 9 (23.7%) of partial remission and 9 (23.7%) other where treatment was discontinued. Major adverse effects included local pain (4 [10.5%]), new onset uveitis (1 [2.6%]) andrash (1 [2.6%]), responsible of 1case of treatment discontinuation. Predictors for complete remission on adalimumab were oligoarticular form (β = 3.450, p = 0.009) and negative RF (β = 2.381, p = 0.036); while predictors for nonre-sponse, whether complete or partial, were polyarticular form (β =-3.784, p = 0.005) and positive anti-CCP (β =-3.178, p = 0.021). Conclusion: Adalimumab is an efficient and relatively safe alternative in the treatment of JIA with relatively high remission rates and lower rates of adverse effects. Further multicentre experiences are warranted to prove its efficacy and safety in the Saudi patients.