The scientific agreement on firearm issues

10Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction No one has systematically collected the views of firearm researchers to determine if and where agreement exists on the scientific evidence about firearms and firearm violence. Methods We send a short monthly on-line survey to firearm researchers. Each survey asks respondents their level of agreement with a statement about firearms, their rating of the quality of the scientific evidence on the specific issue, their familiarity with that literature and their area of expertise. Survey participants are first-authors of a firearms article published in a peer-reviewed journal since 2011. For the first 15 surveys, on average, surveys were sent to 322 researchers, and 109 researchers responded (34% response rate). Results Among respondents, approximately 46% were public health researchers and 32% were sociologists/ criminologists. Agreement exists among firearm researchers that more guns and weaker gun laws cause serious public health problems, that the costs of gun availability are typically greater than the benefits and that stronger gun laws may improve public safety and health. 84% of researchers agreed, and only 8% disagreed with the statement ‘in the United States, having a gun in the home increases the risk of suicide’. For only three statements did most respondents rate the quality of the scientific evidence as strong or very strong. Overall, there was a higher level of agreement among public health/medicine researchers than among researchers in the other disciplines. Discussion Surveys of researchers can provide useful information about agreement on specific issues and about the quality of the scientific evidence.

References Powered by Scopus

The accessibility of firearms and risk for suicide and homicide victimization among household members: A systematic review and meta-analysis

475Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Climate change prediction: Erring on the side of least drama?

260Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Firearms and Violence: A Critical Review

216Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Toward a United States of health: Implications of understanding the US burden of disease

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Considerations for Developing an Agenda for Gun Violence Prevention Research

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Firearm-related research articles in health sciences by funding status and type: A scoping review

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hemenway, D., & Nolan, E. P. (2017). The scientific agreement on firearm issues. Injury Prevention, 23(4), 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042146

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

64%

Researcher 3

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 4

33%

Psychology 4

33%

Computer Science 2

17%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

17%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 3
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free