Arguing with the devil: Teaching in controversial domains

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There are certain problems inherent in teaching in controversial domains. In this paper, we present a prototype of an intelligent tutoring system called OLIA which addresses some of these problems. We focus here on OLIA’s Devil’s advocate strategy which is a method for teaching through a debate between the user and the system. This paper takes advantage of existing work using a meta-level argumentation framework for knowledge representation in controversial domains. In this framework statements are linked by primitive relations such as disagreement, equivalence and justification, and higher order meta-level ones such as counter-arguments and corroborations. We investigate the use of this framework as the basis for the OLIA system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Retails, S., Pain, H., & Haggith, M. (1996). Arguing with the devil: Teaching in controversial domains. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 1086, pp. 659–667). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61327-7_166

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free