Where should stepped-wedge designs be placed in the evidence hierarchy? Using the “within-wedge” analysis approach to generate evidence of possible bias

Terry Haines; Karla Hemming; Alan Girling; Anne-Marie Hill; Max Bulsara; Jon Deeks

Journal ArticleOPEN ACCESS

Where should stepped-wedge designs be placed in the evidence hierarchy? Using the “within-wedge” analysis approach to generate evidence of possible bias

Haines T
Hemming K
Girling A
et al.

BMC Health Services Research (2014) 14(S2)

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-s2-p54

N/ACitations

5Readers

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haines, T., Hemming, K., Girling, A., Hill, A.-M., Bulsara, M., & Deeks, J. (2014). Where should stepped-wedge designs be placed in the evidence hierarchy? Using the “within-wedge” analysis approach to generate evidence of possible bias. BMC Health Services Research, 14(S2). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-s2-p54

Where should stepped-wedge designs be placed in the evidence hierarchy? Using the “within-wedge” analysis approach to generate evidence of possible bias

Cite

Register to see more suggestions