Generative Artificial Intelligence in Tertiary Education: Assessment Redesign Principles and Considerations

4Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI) such as ChatGPT has sparked significant assessment concerns within tertiary education. Assessment concerns have largely revolved around academic integrity issues among students, such as plagiarism and cheating. Nonetheless, it is also critical to consider that generative AI models trained on information retrieved from the Internet could produce biased and discriminatory outputs, and hallucination issues in large language models upon which generative AI acts provide made-up and untruthful outputs. This article considers the affordances and challenges of generative AI specific to assessments within tertiary education. It illustrates considerations for assessment redesign with the existence of generative AI and proposes the Against, Avoid and Adopt (AAA) principle to rethink and redesign assessments. It argues that more generative AI tools will emerge exponentially, and hence, engaging in an arms race against generative AI and policing the use of these technologies may not address the fundamental issues in assessments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lye, C. Y., & Lim, L. (2024, June 1). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Tertiary Education: Assessment Redesign Principles and Considerations. Education Sciences. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060569

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free