Redundancy-based correction of automatically extracted facts

16Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The accuracy of event extraction is limited by a number of complicating factors, with errors compounded at all sages inside the Information Extraction pipeline. In this paper, we present methods for recovering automatically from errors committed in the pipeline processing. Recovery is achieved via post-processing facts aggregated over a large collection of documents, and suggesting corrections based on evidence external to the document. A further improvement is derived from propagating multiple, locally non-best slot fills through the pipeline. Evaluation shows that the global analysis is over 10 times more likely to suggest valid corrections to the local-only analysis than it is to suggest erroneous ones. This yields a substantial overall gain, with no supervised training. © 2005 Association for Computational Linguistics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yangarber, R., & Jokipii, L. (2005). Redundancy-based correction of automatically extracted facts. In HLT/EMNLP 2005 - Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference (pp. 57–64). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/1220575.1220583

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free