A pilot study about infertile men's awareness of their reprotoxic exposures and the intervention of occupational medicine to assess them

3Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Male infertility related to professional reprotoxic exposure has been assessed in several studies. Collaboration between occupational physicians and patients can yield information about the preventive measures that can be taken to avoid such exposure. The use of preventive measures is determined by the collaboration between reproductive medicine and occupational medicine and also by the patient's awareness of reprotoxic occupational exposures. Our andrology laboratory developed a systematic environmental interview that an occupational physician administers before semen analysis to assess patients' occupational reprotoxic chemical and physical exposures. This observational prospective study evaluated patients' feelings regarding this interview. The main outcome measure was the participants' score to determine their general reprotoxicant knowledge. The study also evaluated the patients' satisfaction about the interview with occupational physician and their attitude about reproductive toxicants. Results: The mean score for general knowledge of reprotoxicants was 9.6 ± 2.7/16. The most frequently underestimated reprotoxic factor was excessive heat (34.7 % correct responses). In cases of semen parameter abnormalities AND recognized occupational reprotoxic exposure, 63.2 % of the patients said they would use individual protective devices, and 55.1 % said they would temporarily adapt their workstation. Regarding the interview with the laboratory's occupational physician, 80.7 % considered it moderately or very useful. Of the interviewed patients, 46.2 % reported having changed their living habits 2 months after the interview, and 88.5 % were satisfied or very satisfied with the care they received. All of the respondents said it would be useful to extend the interview to include their wives. Conclusions: The data suggest that patients' knowledge about reprotoxic exposures can be improved, particularly knowledge related to physical exposure. The vast majority of patients were satisfied with the introduction of this new collaboration between reproductive and occupational medicine.

Figures

  • Fig. 1 Flow chart of the survey
  • Fig. 2 Characteristics of the population. “Employees” include Public service employees, clerical jobs, service and sales workers; « Workmen » include skilled or unskilled workers, agricultural labourers; « Intermediate Occupations » include foremen, technicians and associate professionals from health, teaching, public service… (function between managers and operating agents)
  • Table 1 Evaluation of patients’ self-perceived occupational exposures and concordance with exposures assessed by the occupational physician
  • Fig. 3 Answers to the second questionnaire

References Powered by Scopus

Occupational heat exposure and male fertility: A review

218Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preventing heat-related illness among agricultural workers

165Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Increase in scrotal temperature in car drivers

103Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Wuzi-Yanzong prescription alleviates spermatogenesis disorder induced by heat stress dependent on Akt, NF-κB signaling pathway

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Subfertile patients underestimate their risk factors of reprotoxic exposure

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Occupational reprotoxic chemical risk assessment: Census of online databases

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Christiaens, A., Sari-Minodier, I., Tardieu, S., Ianos, O., Adnot, S., Courbiere, B., & Perrin, J. (2016). A pilot study about infertile men’s awareness of their reprotoxic exposures and the intervention of occupational medicine to assess them. Basic and Clinical Andrology, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12610-016-0036-5

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘21‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

22%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

50%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

25%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

17%

Engineering 1

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 9

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0