How should minimally important change scores for the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure be interpreted? A validation using varied methods

31Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), scored 0–28, is the core outcome instrument recommended for measuring patient-reported atopic eczema symptoms in clinical trials. To date, two published studies have broadly concurred that the minimally important change (MIC) of the POEM is three points. Further assessment of the MIC of POEM in different populations, and using a variety of methods, will improve interpretability of the POEM in research and clinical practice. Objectives: To calculate the smallest detectable change in the POEM and estimate the MIC of the POEM using a variety of methods in a trial dataset of children with moderate-to-severe atopic eczema. Methods: This study used distribution-based and anchor-based methods to calculate the MIC of the POEM in children with moderate-to-severe eczema. Results: Data were collected from 300 children. The smallest detectable change was 2·13. The MIC estimates were 1·07 (using 0·2 SD of baseline POEM scores) and 2·68 (using 0·5 SD of baseline POEM scores) based on distribution-based methods; were 3·09–6·13 based on patient-/parent-reported anchor-based methods; and were 3·23–5·38 based on investigator-reported anchor-based methods. Conclusions: We recommend the following thresholds be used to interpret changes in POEM scores: ≤ 2, unlikely to be a change beyond measurement error; 2·1–2·9, a small change detected that is likely to be beyond measurement error but may not be clinically important; 3–3·9, probably a clinically important change; ≥ 4, very likely to be a clinically important change.

References Powered by Scopus

Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation

3854Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measurement in medicine: A practical guide

2241Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes

1731Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Development and initial testing of a new instrument to measure the experience of eczema control in adults and children: Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP)

79Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nemolizumab plus topical agents in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and moderate-to-severe pruritus provide improvement in pruritus and signs of AD for up to 68 weeks: results from two phase III, long-term studies*

74Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effectiveness and safety of lotion, cream, gel, and ointment emollients for childhood eczema: a pragmatic, randomised, phase 4, superiority trial

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Howells, L., Ratib, S., Chalmers, J. R., Bradshaw, L., & Thomas, K. S. (2018). How should minimally important change scores for the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure be interpreted? A validation using varied methods. British Journal of Dermatology, 178(5), 1135–1142. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.16367

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

44%

Researcher 5

28%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 15

75%

Computer Science 2

10%

Engineering 2

10%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 26

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0