Clinical risk model for predicting 1-year mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

16Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: Estimating 1-year life expectancy is an essential factor when evaluating appropriate indicators for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Background: It is clinically useful in developing a reliable risk model for predicting 1-year mortality after TAVR. Methods: We evaluated 2,588 patients who underwent TAVR using data from the Optimized CathEter vAlvular iNtervention (OCEAN) Japanese multicenter registry from October 2013 to May 2017. The 1-year clinical follow-up was achieved by 99.5% of the entire population (n = 2,575). Patients were randomly divided into two cohorts: the derivation cohort (n = 1,931, 75% of the study population) and the validation cohort (n = 644). Considerable clinical variables including individual patient's comorbidities and frailty markers were used for predicting 1-year mortality following TAVR. Results: In the derivation cohort, a multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that sex, body mass index, Clinical Frailty Scale, atrial fibrillation, peripheral artery disease, prior cardiac surgery, serum albumin, renal function as estimated glomerular filtration rate, and presence of pulmonary disease were independent predictors of 1-year mortality after TAVR. Using these variables, a risk prediction model was constructed to estimate the 1-year risk of mortality after TAVR. In the validation cohort, the risk prediction model revealed high discrimination ability and acceptable calibration with area under the curve of 0.763 (95% confidence interval, 0.728–0.795, p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yamamoto, M., Otsuka, T., Shimura, T., Yamaguchi, R., Adachi, Y., Kagase, A., … Hayashida, K. (2021). Clinical risk model for predicting 1-year mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 97(4), E544–E551. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29130

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free