The diagnostic and prognostic value of D-dimer in different types of aortic dissection

11Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the serum D-dimer level and its diagnostic and prognostic predictive value in patients with different types of aortic dissection. Methods: Eighty-four aortic dissection patients who were diagnosed clinically in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2021 were selected for the study. All patients were divided into Stanford type A (39 cases) and Stanford type B (45 cases) groups. The serum D-dimer level was detected at 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 72 h after admission to the hospital, and its expression level with different types of aortic dissection was analyzed. The relationship between D-dimer and the prognosis of patients was also analyzed. Results: The serum D-dimer levels of patients in group A were significantly higher than those in group B at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 72 h after admission, and the differences were statistically significant. In group A, 16 patients died, and 23 patients survived, while in group B, 18 patients died, and 27 patients survived. The serum D-dimer level of the dead and surviving patients in group A was significantly higher than that of group B, and the serum D-dimer level of dead patients in groups A and B was significantly higher than that of surviving patients. For diagnostic value, the AUC was 0.89, sensitivity was 76.92%, specificity was 90.00% in group A, and the AUC was 0.82, sensitivity was 71.11%, and specificity was 85.00% in group B. For the prognostic predicted value, the AUC was 0.74 in group A, while the AUC was 0.69 in group B. Conclusions: D-dimer has different serum levels in different types of aortic dissection patients, with higher levels in Stanford A. Serum D-dimer levels may be used as a better biomarker to diagnose the two types of aortic dissection and play an important role in patient prognostic prediction, especially Stanford type A.

References Powered by Scopus

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies

6106Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Management of Acute Aortic Dissections

997Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Presentation, diagnosis, and outcomes of acute aortic dissection: 17-year trends from the international registry of acute aortic dissection

924Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A comprehensive exploration of novel biomarkers for the early diagnosis of aortic dissection

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Relationship between preoperative lymphocyte to monocyte ratio and surgery outcome in type A aortic dissection

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Predictive value of preoperative platelet count and D-dimer levels for spinal cord injury following acute type a aortic dissection

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, D., Chen, J., Sun, J., Chen, H., Li, F., & Wang, J. (2022). The diagnostic and prognostic value of D-dimer in different types of aortic dissection. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01940-5

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 1

50%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

50%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free