BIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF STEEL AND TITANIUM AS IMPLANT MATERIAL IN ORTHOPEDIC TRAUMA SURGERY The following case from the ICUC database, where a titanium plate was implanted into a flourishing infection, represents the clinical experience leading to preferring titanium over steel. (Fig. 1) (6). Current opinions regarding biological aspects of implant function. The "street" opinions regarding the biological aspects of the use of steel versus titanium as a surgical trauma implant material differ widely. Statements of opinion leaders range from "I do not see any difference in the biological behavior between steel and titanium in clinical application" to "I successfully use titanium implants in infected areas in a situation where steel would act as foreign body "sustaining" infection." Furthermore, some comments imply that clinical proof for the superiority of titanium in human application is lacking. The following tries to clarify the issues addressing the different aspects more through a practical clinical approach than a purely scientific one, this includes simplifications. Today's overall biocompatibility of implant materials is acceptable but: As the vast majority of secondary surgeries are elective procedures this allows the selection of implant materials with optimal infection resistance. The different biological reactions of stainless steel and titanium are important for this segment of clinical pathologies. Biological tole - rance (18) depends on the toxicity and on the amount of soluble implant material released. Release, diffusion and washout through blood circulation determine the local concentration of the corrosion products. Alloying components of steel, especially nickel and chromium, are less than optimal in respect to tissue tolerance and allergenicity. Titanium as a pure metal provides excellent biological tolerance (3, 4, 16). Better strength was obtained by titanium alloys like TiAl6V4. The latter found limited application as surgical implants. It contains Vanadium (9). Today's high strength titanium alloys contain well tolerated alloying components1 like Zr, Nb, Mo and Ta (ISO 5832-14) (7, 15). The corrosion rate of surgical implants is kept low by the passive layer formed when immerged in body fluids (13, 14). The passive layer may be locally destroyed, for instance, by mechanical fretting or by local corrosion conditions like in pitting; it is renewed by an electrochemical corrosion process which releases alloying components like Ni and Cr (Fig. 2) (10). The amount of soluble component may vary markedly depending on the local electrochemical conditions (see below).
CITATION STYLE
PERREN, S. M., REGAZZONI, P., & FERNANDEZ, A. A. (2017). How to Choose between the Implant Materials Steel and Titanium in Orthopedic Trauma Surgery: Part 1 - Mechanical Aspects. Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, 84(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2017/001
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.