Formal differentiation at upper secondary education in finland: Subject-level choices and stratified pathways to socio-economic status and unemployment

4Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We study labour market outcomes by formal differentiation at upper secondary and tertiary level in Finland. Using full population register data, we take individuals born in 1976 and explore their socio-economic status and the probability of unemployment by educational qualifications and social origin in early adulthood (age 30) and at occupational maturity (age 40). We differentiate based on the level of maths, the most consequential subject choice at general upper secondary education, and show that subject-level choices divert students to stratified tertiary-level degrees and labour market positions net of prior school performance, social origin and gender. In addition, we show that educational performance and qualifications mediate the association between social origin and socio-economic status by 81‒83%, leaving around one fifth to unobserved social origin differences. We also find that there are no major differences between upper secondary school tracks with respect to experiencing unemployment at age 30 or 40. Moreover, further educational degrees do not appear to provide additional protection against unemployment than having obtained an upper secondary qualification.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heiskala, L., Erola, J., & McMullin, P. (2021). Formal differentiation at upper secondary education in finland: Subject-level choices and stratified pathways to socio-economic status and unemployment. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 12(3), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1332/175795921X16137561576439

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free