Making MRI available for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: growing need and barriers to change

29Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Abstract: More than half of us will need a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan in our lifetimes. MRI is an unmatched diagnostic test for an expanding range of indications including neurological and musculoskeletal disorders, cancer diagnosis, and treatment planning. Unfortunately, patients with cardiac pacemakers or defibrillators have historically been prevented from having MRI because of safety concerns. This results in delayed diagnoses, more invasive investigations, and increased cost. Major developments have addressed this—newer devices are designed to be safe in MRI machines under specific conditions, and older legacy devices can be scanned provided strict protocols are followed. This service however remains difficult to deliver sustainably worldwide: MRI provision remains grossly inadequate because patients are less likely to be referred, and face difficulties accessing services even when referred. Barriers still exist but are no longer technical. These include logistical hurdles (poor cardiology and radiology interaction at physician and technician levels), financial incentives (re-imbursement is either absent or fails to acknowledge the complexity), and education (physicians self-censor MRI requests). This article therefore highlights the recent changes in the clinical, logistical, and regulatory landscape. The aim of the article is to enable and encourage healthcare providers and local champions to build MRI services urgently for cardiac device patients, so that they may benefit from the same access to MRI as everyone else. Key Points: • There is now considerable evidence that MRI can be provided safely to patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). However, the volume of MRI scans delivered to patients with CIEDs is fifty times lower than that of the estimated need, and patients are approximately fifty times less likely to be referred. • Because scans for this patient group are frequently for cancer diagnosis and treatment planning, MRI services need to develop rapidly, but the barriers are no longer technical. • New services face logistical, educational, and financial hurdles which can be addressed effectively to establish a sustainable service at scale.

References Powered by Scopus

Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study

2523Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

213 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy

1787Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Complication rates associated with pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator replacements and upgrade procedures: Results from the REPLACE registry

668Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Evidence to support magnetic resonance conditional labelling of all pacemaker and defibrillator leads in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Altered spontaneous brain activity patterns in dysthyroid optic neuropathy: A resting-state fMRI study

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Magnetic resonance imaging safety in patients with abandoned or functioning epicardial pacing leads

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bhuva, A. N., Moralee, R., Moon, J. C., & Manisty, C. H. (2020). Making MRI available for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: growing need and barriers to change. European Radiology, 30(3), 1378–1384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06449-5

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

43%

Researcher 11

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 20

54%

Engineering 7

19%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

16%

Physics and Astronomy 4

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 15

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0