Commentary: Redescriptions

6Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this comment I consider the generative tensions between phenomenological and psychodynamic approaches in anthropology. I propose several reasons for the recent interest in phenomenological perspectives, and suggest several ways that there might be a productive interplay between the two approaches. © 2012 by the American Anthropological Association.

References Powered by Scopus

Phenomenological approaches in anthropology

329Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Citizens-in-Waiting, Deportees-in-Waiting: Power, Temporality, and Suffering in the U.S. Asylum System

87Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Living in a Makeshift World? Mobility, Temporariness, and Everyday Life in Indonesia

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Good, the Dead, and the Other: Chronicles of a Nepali Phantasmicide

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Desjarlais, R. (2012, March). Commentary: Redescriptions. Ethos. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1352.2011.01233.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

80%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 12

75%

Arts and Humanities 4

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free