Collusion-secure fingerprinting for digital data

284Citations
Citations of this article
161Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper discusses methods for assigning codewords for the purpose of fingerprinting digital data (e.g., software, documents, and images). Fingerprinting consists of uniquely marking and registering each copy of the data. This marking allows a distributor to detect any unauthorized copy and trace it back to the user. This threat of detection will deter users from releasing unauthorized copies. A problem arises when users collude: For digital data, two different fingerprinted objects can be compared and the differences between them detected. Hence, a set of users can collude to detect the location of the fingerprint. They can then alter the fingerprint to mask their identities. We present a general fingerprinting solution which is secure in the context of collusion. In addition, we discuss methods for distributing fingerprinted data.

References Powered by Scopus

Tracing traitors

512Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Families of finite sets in which no set is covered by the union of r others

363Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Construction of asymptotically good low-rate error-correcting codes through pseudo-random graphs

187Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Multimedia watermarking techniques

1159Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Digital Watermarking and Steganography

886Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Collusion-secure fingerprinting for digital data

839Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boneh, D., & Shaw, J. (1995). Collusion-secure fingerprinting for digital data. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 963, pp. 452–465). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44750-4_36

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 58

70%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 10

12%

Researcher 5

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 79

56%

Computer Science 54

39%

Mathematics 5

4%

Physics and Astronomy 2

1%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0