Purpose: To undertake a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to determine whether routine use of a tourniquet is a better choice for knee arthroscopic procedures. Methods: Randomized controlled trials which evaluated the application of a tourniquet were selected, gathering information about arthroscopic visualization and operative time. The random-effects meta-analysis was performed using relative risk calculated from the raw data. Results: A total of five eligible studies were selected in this meta-analysis with 471 participants. There was no significant difference in visualization or operative time between the tourniquet and the non-tourniquet group. Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to support the hypothesis that patients would benefit from routinely applying a tourniquet. The use of a tourniquet did not show any advantage to arthroscopic procedures. Level of evidence: Therapeutic randomized controlled trials, Level I. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.
CITATION STYLE
Zhang, Y., Li, L., Wang, J., Li, Z. han, & Shi, Z. jun. (2013). Do patients benefit from tourniquet in arthroscopic surgeries of the knee? Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 21(5), 1125–1130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2094-3
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.