Detection, Identification and Monitoring of Chemical Warfare Agents: a Comparison Between on-Field and in-Lab Approach

2Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Detection, identification and monitoring is an essential step in responding to any event involving toxic chemical warfare agents. There is however a series of main differences between on-field and in-lab detection of highly hazardous chemicals. For a haz-mat first responder at an incident site or for an analytical chemist working in a conventional laboratory, time scale and the accuracy level of the analytical response is totally different. Then, civilian responders’ absolute priority is to save lives, with a strict zero-risk approach. Conversely, armed forces’ approach is mission-oriented and risks, even under life-threatening conditions, might be considered acceptable, under extreme conditions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guidotti, M., Ranghieri, M. C., & Econdi, S. (2020). Detection, Identification and Monitoring of Chemical Warfare Agents: a Comparison Between on-Field and in-Lab Approach. In NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology (pp. 235–238). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-2041-8_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free