Measuring mental health in a cost-effective manner

145Citations
Citations of this article
215Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Mental health has been found to contribute significantly to the global burden of disease. This has raised the profile of mental health in developing countries. Many countries still do not have mental health policies, nor do they incorporate mental health in their primary care package. Community mental health profiles are needed to inform policy. There is a demand for more studies of mental health and the inclusion of mental health measures in more general, comprehensive, population-based health surveys. This article reviews the use and performance of a World Health Organization-endorsed instrument known as the Self-Reporting Questionnaire 20 items (SRQ20). The paper concludes that the high face and criterion validity, ease of use and suitability for administration by lay workers support the use of the SRQ20 as a cost-effective instrument with which to measure community mental health.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harpham, T., Reichenheim, M., Oser, R., Thomas, E., Hamid, N., Jaswal, S., … Aidoo, M. (2003, September). Measuring mental health in a cost-effective manner. Health Policy and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czg041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free