Acceptability of embodied conversational agent in a health care context

18Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

While the interest of Embodied Conversational Agents (ECA) in health care context increased, the extent to which patients find ECAs acceptable should be more evaluated. Thus, in this study, we evaluated the acceptability of an ECA who conducts a clinical structured interview to make a medical diagnosis, in comparison with the same clinical structured interview presented in written form on a tablet screen. 178 patients participated to the study (102 females (57.3 %); Mean age = 46.5 years ± 12.9, range 19–64; Mean educational level = 13.3 years ± 3.1). It was showed that patients perceived globally the acceptability of the ECA higher than the tablet. This higher acceptability was linked rather to higher satisfaction than to higher usability. Moreover, the patients were more satisfied when they repeated the clinical interview with the ECA than with the tablet. Thus ECA usage could avoid the decrease of satisfaction of repeated computerized clinical interviews.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Micoulaud-Franchi, J. A., Sagaspe, P., De Sevin, E., Bioulac, S., Sauteraud, A., & Philip, P. (2016). Acceptability of embodied conversational agent in a health care context. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10011 LNAI, pp. 416–419). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47665-0_45

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free