Assessment of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) methods with biochemical markers in lumbar and femoral osteoporosis diagnosis

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: In this study we aimed to investigate whether there is a difference in osteoporosis detection rates with dual energy x-ray absorbsiometry (DXA) and Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) and relationship between bone-related biochemical markers. Methods: 34 postmenopausal women who admitted to Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic with complaints of dorsalgia. Lumbar and thoracal X-rays were obtained in all patients. Bone mineral density measurements were performed with DXA and QCT. Therefore, osteoporosis and osteopenia rates were detected. Serum levels of calcium, phosphorus, bone-spesific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), osteocalcin, parathormone, calcitonin and 25-OH vitamin D3 were measured. Results: The mean age of patients was 63.44+9.34 years. L2-L4 vertebrae T-score in 6/34 (17.64%) patients and Femoral neck T-score in 3/34 (8.82%) patients were <2.5 in DXA evaluation. With QCT evaluation, L2-L4 vertebrae T-score in 31/34 (91.1%) patients and femoral neck T-score in 2/34 (5.88%) patients were <2.5. Osteoporosis detection rates were higher with QCT compared to DXA and it was found statistically significant (p<0.005). Statistically significant relationship was found between lumbar and femur T scores of bone mineral density and calcitonin (p<0.005). Conclusion: Osteoporosis detection rates were higher with QCT compared to DXA. QCT seems to be more valuable to detect osteoporosis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gençbay, M. B., Işıksaçan, N., & Sarıkaya, N. Ö. (2019). Assessment of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) methods with biochemical markers in lumbar and femoral osteoporosis diagnosis. Medical Journal of Bakirkoy, 15(1), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.4274/BTDMJB.galenos.2019.20190125101336

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free