Evidence of syntactic working memory usage in MEG data

7Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

While reading times are often used to measure working memory load, frequency effects (such as surprisal or n-gram frequencies) also have strong confounding effects on reading times. This work uses a naturalistic audio corpus with magnetoencephalographic (MEG) annotations to measure working memory load during sentence processing. Alpha oscillations in posterior regions of the brain have been found to correlate with working memory load in non-linguistic tasks (Jensen et al., 2002), and the present study extends these findings to working memory load caused by syntactic center embeddings. Moreover, this work finds that frequency effects in naturally-occurring stimuli do not significantly contribute to neural oscillations in any frequency band, which suggests that many modeling claims could be tested on this sort of data even without controlling for frequency effects.

References Powered by Scopus

EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis

17752Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python

2043Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Neuronal synchrony: A versatile code for the definition of relations?

2013Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Finding syntax in human encephalography with beam search

79Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Probabilistic language models in cognitive neuroscience: Promises and pitfalls

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

M/EEG analysis of naturalistic stories: a review from speech to language processing

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Schijndel, M., Murphy, B., & Schuler, W. (2015). Evidence of syntactic working memory usage in MEG data. In 6th Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics, CMCL 2015 at the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT 2015 - Proceedings (pp. 79–88). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/w15-1109

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 28

67%

Researcher 9

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 26

58%

Linguistics 12

27%

Psychology 4

9%

Neuroscience 3

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free