Serology in covid-19: Comparison of two methods

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The aim of our study was to examine the performance of two assays in detecting SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Methods: A total of 127 COVID-19 disease contacts from the Infectious Diseases Department were included. Two serological tests were used: SARS-CoV-2 IgG CMIA on the Alinity system (Abbott) and LIAISON® SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG CLIA (DiaSorin). Results: The assays exhibited a 96.85% (123/127 patients) test result agreement. In two cases, the positive results obtained by SARS-CoV-2 IgG CMIA on the Alinity system (Abbott) were negative based on the LIAISON® SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG CLIA (DiaSorin) test, and in two cases, negative results from the LIAISON® SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG CLIA (DiaSorin) test were positive with the SARS-CoV-2 IgG CMIA on the Alinity system (Abbott). Conclusions: Based on the results of our study, we conclude that in population medicine, the assessments of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after exposure to SARS-CoV-2 virus based on spike protein or nucleocapsid protein show comparable effectiveness.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moniuszko-Malinowska, A., Jelski, W., Dunaj, J., Mroczko, B., Czupryna, P., Kruszewska, E., & Pancewicz, S. (2021). Serology in covid-19: Comparison of two methods. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126497

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free