Situation analysis on evidence-informed health policy-making in Poland

Abstract

term implications of Brexit to ensure that health and inequalities are considered at every juncture.This unique work demonstrates continued leadership by Wales in the field of impact assessment and 'health in policies' and has been positively received. It has transferable learnings for many nation states and health policy leads. Key messages: Brexit is a major policy change with major health impacts. HIA is an informative and influencing process to support planning and future policy making. using a pre-tested, self-administrated questionnaire. Participants were Danish policymakers' members of the Danish Society of Public Health (DSPH) and with practical experience being involved in a health policy-making process. The questionnaire was distributed through the DSPH members email list. Reported outcome variables; for this abstract are parts of the larger study: health policymakers' research involvement in the last 12Mo; policymakers' motiva-tors and barriers to use and produce research in policy-making. Results: Response rate: 100/480 (15%). 78% were involved in critical evaluation of research for policy-making; 77% were able to identify relevant research literature; 41% did not use research evidence; 40% did not conduct any surveys; 57% did not write research reports; 65% never used reference systems; 46% did not analyze any research data. The three motivators reported to use and produce research in the last 12Mo were: identification of the problem that needs to be addressed; development of research skills; and job satisfaction. The three main barriers were: other job-related priorities; lack of time for research; lack of research funding. Conclusions: This study reinforced that public health policymakers need more practical knowledge and skills as well as organizational support and management to use and produce research evidence for evidence-informed policy-making. Key messages: Successful evidence-informed policymaking requires capacity-building interventions targeting policymakers, supported, implemented and evaluated by their organizations. Policymakers do not dismiss evidence-informed policy practice, but their ''positions'' and conditions at a work place sometimes do not allow them to fully follow it. Background: Over the last few years, increased international attention has been paid to bridging the gap between health research and policy-making. The situation analysis on evidence-informed policy-making (EIP) in Poland aims to increase understanding of interactions among a country's research and policy-making communities, to determine where and how to best establish a knowledge translation platform (KTP), i.e. an organization or network that through its structure and functioning brings the worlds of research and policy together. Methods: The methods were guided by the EVIPNet Europe Situation Analysis Manual and included a literature review, key-informant interviews and survey data analysis. Results: In Poland, the existence of incentives or requirements stipulating the use of research evidence in health policy varies, depending on the type of policy. The use of evidence is a standard practice in drug policy, and in decisions related to the inclusion of services in the health benefit package. In other areas, some good practice examples of using evidence in policy can be identified. Yet these are rather individual, isolated and bottom-up initiatives, which neither occur systematically, nor routinely. Key challenges in view of strengthening a systemic approach to EIP relate to: overlapping mandates of key health system and research institutions, generally low research capacity and lack of knowledge translation skills. Conclusions: Establishing and operationalizing a KTP can be an effective means of supporting sustainable EIP. Building such infrastructure , however, is a longer-term and complex process that needs to be based on the current characteristics of the country's EIP landscape. The proposed model of a future KTP in Poland is a network with a joint secretariat within the Ministry of Health. Such form can take advantage of existing organizations' competencies via information exchange and cooperation. Key messages: Although systemic mechanisms for evidence-informed health policy are missing in Poland, its importance is recognized among major health system stakeholders. The proposed model of a future knowledge translation platform in Poland is a network with a joint secretariat within the Ministry of Health.