How Terrorism Does (and Does Not) Affect Citizens’ Political Attitudes: A Meta-Analysis

36Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

How does terrorism affect citizens’ political attitudes? Over the years, many scholars have tried to answer this question. This article performs a meta-analysis on this literature, reviewing about 325 studies conducted between 1985 and 2020 on more than 400,000 respondents. The findings confirm that terrorism is associated—to a small but significant extent—with outgroup hostility, political conservatism and rally-‘round-the-flag effects. At the same time, the effects of terrorism vary widely, with studies on Islamist violence, conducted in the United States or Israel, and using cross-sectional data yielding stronger results on average. Finally, the review reveals remaining gaps in this field of study, including a lack of research on non-Islamist violence or conducted in non-Western contexts. Taken together, this meta-analysis consolidates existing evidence, determines which results hold across contexts, and identifies key gaps in our current knowledge. Its data can also be accessed interactively via a Shiny App.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Godefroidt, A. (2023). How Terrorism Does (and Does Not) Affect Citizens’ Political Attitudes: A Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 67(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12692

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free