Adapting peepholing to regression trees

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper presents an adaptation of the peepholing method to regression trees. Peepholing was described as a means to overcome the major computational bottleneck of growing classification trees by Catlett [3]. This method involves two major steps: shortlisting and bunkering. The former has the goal of eliminating some continuous variables from consideration when growing the tree, while the second tries to restrict the range of values of the remaining continuous variables that should be considered when searching for the best cut point split. Both are effective means of overcoming the most costly step of growing tree-based models: sorting the values of the continuous variables before selecting their best split. In this work we describe the adaptations that are necessary to use this method within regression trees. The major adaptations involve developing means to obtain biased estimates of the criterion used to select the best split of these models. We present some preliminary experiments that show the effectiveness of our proposal. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Torgo, L., & Marques, J. (2005). Adapting peepholing to regression trees. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 3808 LNCS, pp. 293–303). https://doi.org/10.1007/11595014_30

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free