Systems thinking and complexity science–informed evaluation frameworks: Assessment of The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for Agriculture and Food

12Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Despite the increasing literature, applications, and discussions over the last 15 years, there remain questions about how to bring systems thinking and complexity science (STCS) into evaluation in ways that meaningfully enhance its practice, use, and results. One pathway forward is bridging the gap between the large STCS body of knowledge and evaluation practice by synthesizing STCS insights into actionable frameworks to support the work and role of those engaged in evaluation activities. This chapter aims to contribute to this challenge through two main goals. First, the authors develop an actionable STCS framework comprising ten guiding principles, identified through a review of STCS literature to support evaluation practitioners, researchers, and commissioners to bring STCS into evaluation. Secondly—and to test this STCS principles-based framework—this chapter assesses the extent to which TEEBAgriFood, an STCS-informed food systems evaluation framework, advances STCS into evaluation. Results provide learnings and insights about the use of STCS in evaluation design and practice.

References Powered by Scopus

Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change research

937Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A food systems approach to researching food security and its interactions with global environmental change

471Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies

460Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Critical systems practice 4: Check—Evaluating and reflecting on a multimethodological intervention

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: The State of the Art, Second edition

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ethics of evaluation for socio-ecological transformation: Case-based critical systems analysis of motivation, power, expertise, and legitimacy

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bustamante, M., Vidueira, P., & Baker, L. (2021). Systems thinking and complexity science–informed evaluation frameworks: Assessment of The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for Agriculture and Food. New Directions for Evaluation, 2021(170), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20455

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

14%

Researcher 2

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 4

33%

Engineering 3

25%

Environmental Science 3

25%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free