Concordance between laboratories in metal ion testing in patients with metal-on-metal hip implants

6Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Testing of whole blood or serum metal ion levels has become an important part of assessing and monitoring the performance of metal-on-metal bearings, both in hip resurfacing arthroplasty and in total hip replacement. The aim of this study was to determine the concordance between 2 laboratories testing cobalt and chromium ion levels in patients with metal-on-metal bearings. Methods: Serum and whole blood samples from patients who had undergone metalon- metal resurfacing or large-diameter total hip arthroplasty were tested for cobalt and chromium ions in laboratory A (a recognized laboratory) and laboratory B (tasked with testing clinical specimens). Laboratory A performed cobalt and chromium testing on whole blood, and laboratory B performed cobalt testing on whole blood and chromium testing on serum. Results: Samples from 104 patients were tested. Laboratory B reported lower whole blood cobalt levels than laboratory A. Furthermore, laboratory A reported that all patients had elevated whole blood cobalt ion levels compared to the normal reference values for the laboratory, whereas laboratory B reported that 46 patients (44.2%) had whole blood cobalt ion levels within the normal reference range for the laboratory. Conclusion: This comparative study highlights the importance of using a single laboratory for metal ion testing, as values generated from different laboratories may not be directly comparable. With recent literature suggesting that whole blood cobalt levels as low as 1 ppb may be a predictor of adverse reactions to metal debris, accurate clinical measurement needs to be increasingly exact.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saini, R., Railton, P., Boyd, J., Sadrzadeh, H., & Powell, J. N. (2019). Concordance between laboratories in metal ion testing in patients with metal-on-metal hip implants. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 62(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.015717

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free