Query complexity, or why is it difficult to separate NPA∩coNPA from PA by random oracles A?

67Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

By the query-time complexity of a relativized algorithm we mean the total length of oracle queries made; the query-space complexity is the maximum length of the queries made. With respect to these cost measures one can define polynomially time- or space-bounded deterministic, nondeterministic, alternating, etc. Turing machines and the corresponding complexity classes. It turns out that all known relativized separation results operate essentially with this cost measure. Therefore, if certain classes do not separate in the query complexity model, this can be taken as an indication that their relativized separation in the classical cost model will require entirely new principles. A notable unresolved question in relativized complexity theory is the separation of NPA∩ ∩ co NPA from PA under random oracles A. We conjecture that the analogues of these classes actually coincide in the query complexity model, thus indicating an answer to the question in the title. As a first step in the direction of establishing the conjecture, we prove the following result, where polynomial bounds refer to query complexity. If two polynomially query-time-bounded nondeterministic oracle Turing machines accept precisely complementary (oracle dependent) languages LA and {0, 1}*{set minus}LA under every oracle A then there exists a deterministic polynomially query-time-bounded oracle Turing machine that accept LA. The proof involves a sort of greedy strategy to selecting deterministically, from the large set of prospective queries of the two nondeterministic machines, a small subset that suffices to perform an accepting computation in one of the nondeterministic machines. We describe additional algorithmic strategies that may resolve the same problem when the condition holds for a (1-ε) fraction of the oracles A, a step that would bring us to a non-uniform version of the conjecture. Thereby we reduce the question to a combinatorial problem on certain pairs of sets of partial functions on finite sets. © 1989 Akadémiai Kiadó.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tardos, G. (1989). Query complexity, or why is it difficult to separate NPA∩coNPA from PA by random oracles A? Combinatorica, 9(4), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02125350

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free