Comparing outcomes of HIV versus non-HIV patients requiring mechanical ventilation

15Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a predictor of mortality in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Patients with HIV-infections are admitted to the ICU for a variety of reasons that frequently require intubation. While survival rates for HIV-infected patients continue to improve, ICU admission rates have remained consistent. Methods: To observe the consequences of MV in HIV-infected patients, we conducted a retrospective chart review on patients with HIV (n=55) vs. matched HIV-negative patients (n=55) who required MV over a one-year period and compared the groups for differences in outcome and complications. Results: The HIV group had twice the number of deaths (44% vs. 22%, all-cause mortality) (P=0.01). Among the HIV-positive group, 5 of 55 patients required tracheostomy and prolonged MV, compared to 15 of 55 in the control group (9% and 27%, respectively). Successful extubation was virtually identical (47% MV vs. 50% control). Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) was significantly higher among HIV-positive cases (39 of 55 HIV vs. 14 of 55 non-HIV) (P=0.05). Regression analysis revealed that hypotension, hypoalbuminemia, and fever predicted a poorer outcome. Low CD4 cell counts were strongly associated with mortality. Conclusion: HIV-infected patients requiring MV have significantly higher mortality and VAP rates than HIV-negative patients. Since VAP is associated with a poor prognosis, discovering ways to prevent it in the HIV-infected patient may improve outcome. © 2012 Marshfield Clinic.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pathak, V., Rendon, I. S. H., Atrash, S., Gagadam, V. P. R., Bhunia, K., Mallampalli, S. P., … Ciubotaru, R. L. (2012, May 1). Comparing outcomes of HIV versus non-HIV patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Clinical Medicine and Research. https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.2011.987

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free