In-hospital follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillator and pacemaker carriers: Patients inconvenience and points of view. A four-hospital Italian survey

12Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims The increasing volume of pacemaker (PM) and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implants and problems related to their functioning have highlighted the issue of device follow-ups. Patients convenience regarding device visits has been little investigated. This work aims at surveying patients efforts in attending the in-office PM/ICD follow-ups and at evaluating their expectations. Methods and resultsIn four Italian referral centres, over a 3-month period, a 20-point questionnaire was completed by all consecutive patients at in-hospital PM/ICD visits. In total, 1109 questionnaire/patients were evaluated. Pacemakers were 68, ICDs 16, and cardiac resynchronizations (CRTs) (PM + ICD) 16; 38 were females; mean age was 75 ± 11 years. Almost all were scheduled visits. There was frequent reprogramming and clinical examination, even after 6 months from implant. Perceived inconvenience for the in-office follow-up was relevant in 35 of cases; attitudes towards remote monitoring were positive in 88 of cases. Inter-group analysis showed some significant difference: PM patients were older and more frequently female; ICD carriers were younger, had the highest rate of clinical evaluation, a longer journey time, and the most positive opinion about remote follow-up. Cardiac resynchronization patients had a longer waiting time and the lowest inconvenience. Overall inconvenience was independently predicted by increasing age, lengthy travelling times, and being accompanied; favourable opinions about remote monitoring were predicted by overall inconvenience, and, in ICD carriers only, by lack of clinical examination. ConclusionsPatients perceptions of in-hospital PM/ICD visits were affected by age and by journey modalities. Individual factors seem to affect both opinions about in-office visits and expectations towards a possible remote follow-up. © The Author 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gramegna, L., Tomasi, C., Gasparini, G., Scaboro, G., Zanon, F., Boaretto, G., … Tomasi, L. (2012, March). In-hospital follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillator and pacemaker carriers: Patients inconvenience and points of view. A four-hospital Italian survey. Europace. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eur334

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free