Artifacts in Musculoskeletal Ultrasonography: From Physics to Clinics

43Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Ultrasound appears to be the most useful imaging tool in the diagnosis and guided treatment of musculoskeletal disorders. However, ultrasonography has been criticized for being user dependent. Therefore, medical professionals should be familiar with the basic principles of ultrasound imaging (e.g., physics and technical skills) to diminish artifacts and avoid misinterpretation. In this review, we focused on the physics of common artifacts, their clinical significance, and the ways to tackle them in daily practice during musculoskeletal imaging. In particular, artifacts pertaining to the focal zone, beam attenuation, path and side lobe of the beam, speed of the sound, and range ambiguity were described.

References Powered by Scopus

US artifacts

243Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Artifacts in ultrasound imaging

205Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Full-Thickness and Partial-Thickness Supraspinatus Tendon Tears: Value of US Signs in Diagnosis

117Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Sarcopenia Is Associated With Increased Risks of Rotator Cuff Tendon Diseases Among Community-Dwelling Elders: A Cross-Sectional Quantitative Ultrasound Study

66Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Histopathology and high-resolution ultrasound imaging for peripheral nerve (injuries)

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

From histology to sonography in skin and superficial tissue disorders: EURO-MUSCULUS/USPRM* approach

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wu, W. T., Chang, K. V., Hsu, Y. C., Hsu, P. C., Ricci, V., & Özçakar, L. (2020, September 1). Artifacts in Musculoskeletal Ultrasonography: From Physics to Clinics. Diagnostics. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090645

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

60%

Researcher 7

35%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 14

58%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

25%

Computer Science 2

8%

Social Sciences 2

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 19

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0