Hybrid verification technique for decision-making of self-driving vehicles

14Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The evolution of driving technology has recently progressed from active safety features and ADAS systems to fully sensor-guided autonomous driving. Bringing such a vehicle to market requires not only simulation and testing but formal verification to account for all possible traffic scenarios. A new verification approach, which combines the use of two well-known model checkers: model checker for multi-agent systems (MCMAS) and probabilistic model checker (PRISM), is presented for this purpose. The overall structure of our autonomous vehicle (AV) system consists of: (1) A perception system of sensors that feeds data into (2) a rational agent (RA) based on a belief–desire–intention (BDI) architecture, which uses a model of the environment and is connected to the RA for verification of decision-making, and (3) a feedback control systems for following a self-planned path. MCMAS is used to check the consistency and stability of the BDI agent logic during design-time. PRISM is used to provide the RA with the probability of success while it decides to take action during run-time operation. This allows the RA to select movements of the highest probability of success from several generated alternatives. This framework has been tested on a new AV software platform built using the robot operating system (ROS) and virtual reality (VR) Gazebo Simulator. It also includes a parking lot scenario to test the feasibility of this approach in a realistic environment. A practical implementation of the AV system was also carried out on the experimental testbed.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al-Nuaimi, M., Wibowo, S., Qu, H., Aitken, J., & Veres, S. (2021). Hybrid verification technique for decision-making of self-driving vehicles. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/JSAN10030042

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

64%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

9%

Researcher 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 5

38%

Computer Science 4

31%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

15%

Arts and Humanities 2

15%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free