Evidence that the high incidence of treatment failures in Indian kala- azar is due to the emergence of antimony-resistant strains of Leishmania donovani

349Citations
Citations of this article
126Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The possibility that the high frequency of treatment failures in Indian kala-azar might be due to infection with antimony-resistant strains of Leishmania donovani has not been experimentally addressed. L. donovani isolates were obtained from splenic aspiration smears of 24 patients in Bihar, India, who either did not respond (15) or did respond (9) to 1 or more full courses of treatment with sodium antimony gluconate (SAG). A strong correlation (P

References Powered by Scopus

New mechanisms of drug resistance in parasitic protozoa

273Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Drug resistance in leishmaniasis: Its implication in systemic chemotherapy of cutaneous and mucocutaneous disease

230Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

In vitro and in vivo resistance of Leishmania infantum to meglumine antimoniate: A study of 37 strains collected from patients with visceral leishmaniasis

187Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Drug resistance in leishmaniasis

1393Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Leishmaniasis - Current chemotherapy and recent advances in the search for novel drugs

744Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Visceral leishmaniasis: Current status of control, diagnosis, and treatment, and a proposed research and development agenda

658Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lira, R., Sundar, S., Makharia, A., Kenney, R., Gam, A., Saraiva, E., & Sacks, D. (1999). Evidence that the high incidence of treatment failures in Indian kala- azar is due to the emergence of antimony-resistant strains of Leishmania donovani. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 180(2), 564–567. https://doi.org/10.1086/314896

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 50

62%

Researcher 17

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32

42%

Medicine and Dentistry 19

25%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 17

22%

Immunology and Microbiology 8

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free