The narratives of local children and newly arriving forced migrant children about their mutual contacts and friendships in German primary schools

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Even though almost half of the forced migrant population that entered Germany during the last several years are minors, research about the perspective of children on forced migration is very scarce. Drawing on childhood studies, which regard children as being capable of social thinking and acting, and generational theories, which scrutinize how childhood constitutes a common “social space,” this article aims to analyze narratives of local and forced migrant primary school children on flight and integration. Current regulations of the German educational system insert forced migrant children into the regular school system. Within the restrictive framework of schools, which disadvantage newly arriving migrant children by focusing on their German language skills as the primary marker of their educational potential and success, friendship making is the sphere where children can have agency. Children construct the school as their common generational space and discuss flight as the experience of “being new in school.” This allows children to acknowledge their different biographical backgrounds but empathize with each other and identify as generational members through their subjection to the educational system. Local and forced migrant children bridge language differences by performing their friendships through language-learning rituals. Hence, the public primary school system sets preconditions for the structural integration of local and migrant children, but the most important actors who “do integration” as a social process are children themselves.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rohde-Abuba, C. (2020). The narratives of local children and newly arriving forced migrant children about their mutual contacts and friendships in German primary schools. Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research, 12(3), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.25285/2078-1938-2020-12-3-52-69

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free