The Role and Impact of the Multiple-Streams Approach in Comparative Policy Analysis

191Citations
Citations of this article
859Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

John Kingdon’s multiple-streams framework has been widely used since the publication of his book Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies in 1984. The popularity of this agenda-setting framework in comparative policy analysis is especially interesting because the book focused exclusively on the United States. It is not clear, however, that a framework developed exclusively on the basis of the examination of a single, somewhat idiosyncratic national case should be able to generate insights useful in comparative research. This article discusses the nature of the multiple-streams framework and its impact on comparative policy analysis, before outlining its contribution to key debates in the field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Béland, D., & Howlett, M. (2016, May 26). The Role and Impact of the Multiple-Streams Approach in Comparative Policy Analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2016.1174410

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free