Which one to choose: Random walks or spreading activation?

5Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Modeling data as a graph of objects is increasingly popular, as we move away from the relational DB model and try to introduce explicit semantics in IR. Conceptually, one of the main challenges in this context is how to “intelligently” traverse the graph and exploit the associations between the data objects. Two highly used methods in retrieving information on structured data are: Markov chain random walks, as is the basic method for page rank, and spreading activation, which originates from the artificial intelligence area. In this paper, we compare these two methods from a mathematical point of view. Random walks have been preferred in information retrieval, while spreading activation has been proposed before, but not really adopted. In this study we find that they are very similar fundamentally under certain conditions. However, spreading activation has much more flexibility and customization options, while random walks holds concise mathematics foundation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sabetghadam, S., Lupu, M., & Rauber, A. (2014). Which one to choose: Random walks or spreading activation? In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 8849, pp. 112–119). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12979-2_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free