Active electric imaging: Body-object interplay and object's "electric texture"

19Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article deals with the role of fish's body and object's geometry on determining the image spatial shape in pulse Gymnotiforms. This problem was explored by measuring local electric fields along a line on the skin in the presence and absence of objects. We depicted object's electric images at different regions of the electrosensory mosaic, paying particular attention to the perioral region where a fovea has been described. When sensory surface curvature increases relative to the object's curvature, the image details depending on object's shape are blurred and finally disappear. The remaining effect of the object on the stimulus profile depends on the strength of its global polarization. This depends on the length of the object's axis aligned with the field, in turn depending on fish body geometry. Thus, fish's body and self-generated electric field geometries are embodied in this "global effect" of the object. The presence of edges or local changes in impedance at the nearest surface of closely located objects adds peaks to the image profiles ("local effect" or "object's electric texture"). It is concluded that two cues for object recognition may be used by active electroreceptive animals: global effects (informing on object's dimension along the field lines, conductance, and position) and local effects (informing on object's surface). Since the field has fish's centered coordinates, and electrosensory fovea is used for exploration of surfaces, fish fine movements are essential to perform electric perception. We conclude that fish may explore adjacent objects combining active movements and electrogenesis to represent them using electrosensory information. © 2011 Caputi et al.

Figures

  • Figure 1. The image profiles at the fovea do not reflect the local variations in the stimulus patterns. Images of a sphere (16 millimeters placed 1 millimeter away from the skin) evaluated following the T-LEOD procedure A) rmsLEOD profiles (dots, raw data; line, median moving averaged data) evaluated in the absence (black) and presence of the object (red). B) LEOD increment by the presence of the object C) LEOD modulation. Arrows indicate the transition between the top and the trough of the Mexican hat profile. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022793.g001
  • Figure 2. Electric images of a cube on the side of the fish.
  • Figure 3. The effect of the fish body on the electric image. At the fovea, images are similar. A) Image of the same sphere at two distances (16 millimeters diameter, 1 and 4 millimeters away from the skin) showing a reduction in amplitude. B) Normalized profiles showing that the shapes of the profiles are identical. Arrows indicate the transition between the top and the trough of the Mexican hat profile. On the side of the fish, images increase in width when the object is moved away. C) The same sphere placed at two distances (16 millimeters diameter, 2.5 and 5 millimeters away from the skin) showing a reduction in amplitude. D) Normalized profiles showing that the image increased in width when the object was moved away. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022793.g003
  • Figure 4. Effects of fish’s body at the fovea. A) Field profiles recorded along a trajectory following the surface of the jaw of a fish’s cadaver when a sinusoidal field was applied between the rostral and caudal walls of the tank. Red symbols represent the local field measured in the presence of a copper cube facing the fish’s cadaver. Black symbols represent local field measured in the presence of the same object but in the absence of the fish’s body. Blue line represents the effect of the fish’s body calculated as the difference between the two fitted curves. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022793.g004
  • Figure 5. Amplitude of the global effect increases with the length of the field line covered by the object footprint. A and B) Images of cylinders of 10 millimeters diameter base and three different lengths with their main axis oriented along the field line. As the normalized profiles are the same the amplitude of the image grows linearly with the length of the cylinder. C and D) Image of three steel spheres showing that image amplitude increases linearly with the diameter but the normalized profile is the same. E) Image amplitude vs. diameter showing data from 8 spheres. r2 = 0.96 N = 8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022793.g005
  • Figure 6. Importance of the alignment of the object with the field lines. Images of a prolate-spheroid-shaped copper object placed at the same distance but differently oriented with respect to the field. A to C: raw data (dots) and fitted stimulus profiles (lines). Object main axis orientation: A) longitudinal (red), B) vertical (blue), C) transverse (green). D) Modulation profiles show that in the transverse orientation (shorter dimension aligned with the field) the image of the smallest amplitude. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022793.g006
  • Figure 8. Edge effects on the image profiles. A and B) Raw data and fitting curve showing the raw stimulus profiles in the absence (black) and presence of a ‘‘nail shaped’’ object (3 millimeters diameter except for the conical end, 25 millimeters total length) oriented with the tip (red) or the back (blue) towards the fovea. C) Modulation profiles show a sharp peak in the tip facing condition and two peaks on top of the global effect profile corresponding to the limits of the circular base of the object. D) Similar effects when the objects were on the side of the head. Note the Mexican hat effect on the contra-lateral side. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022793.g008
  • Figure 7. Image profiles depend on objects position. A) rmsLEOD stimulus patterns in basal (black), object centered (blue) and object lateralized (red) are compared. The main axis of the object was aligned with the largest field component in each case. Note that when the object was on the side facing a peak of the basal profile the change was greater at the region facing the object and was reduced below the control line on the other side. B) Modulation profiles showed a larger peak and a contra-lateral through when the object was on the side. C) Superimposed normalized profiles obtained from six experiments in which the spheroid was differently oriented but with the closest point facing the same point at the skin (three placed at the middle cold color traces, and three on the side, warm color traces). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022793.g007

References Powered by Scopus

Electric Fields of the Brain: The neurophysics of EEG

2847Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Electric Organs

446Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prey capture in the weakly electric fish Apteronotus albifrons: Sensory acquisition strategies and electrosensory consequences

222Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Electroreception, electrogenesis and electric signal evolution

92Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Electric Imaging through Evolution, a Modeling Study of Commonalities and Differences

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

From static electric images to electric flow: Towards dynamic perceptual cues in active electroreception

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Caputi, Á. A., Aguilera, P. A., & Pereira, A. C. (2011). Active electric imaging: Body-object interplay and object’s “electric texture.” PLoS ONE, 6(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022793

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

59%

Researcher 4

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9

53%

Neuroscience 4

24%

Physics and Astronomy 2

12%

Engineering 2

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0