Temporal and spatial localisation of general movement complexity and variation—Why Gestalt assessment requires experience

3Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: General movements’ assessment (GMA), based on Gestalt perception, identifies infants at risk of cerebral palsy. However, the requirement of ample experience to construct the assessor's inner criteria for abnormal movement hampers its widespread clinical use. This study aims to describe details of general movements (GMs) in various body parts and to investigate their association with GMA-Gestalt. Methods: Participants were 24 typically developing infants and 22 very-high-risk infants. GMs were assessed during the writhing (0-8 weeks) and/or fidgety GM phase (2-5 months) by GMA-Gestalt and a semi-quantification of the duration of simple movements and complex movements in various body parts. Results: During both GM phases, the quality of movement often varied within a single assessment, but the degree of complexity and variation of movements in trunk, arms and legs were interrelated (ρ = 0.32-0.84). Longer durations of complex movements in arms and legs (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wu, Y. C., van Rijssen, I. M., Buurman, M. T., Dijkstra, L. J., Hamer, E. G., & Hadders-Algra, M. (2021). Temporal and spatial localisation of general movement complexity and variation—Why Gestalt assessment requires experience. Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics, 110(1), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15300

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free